Dreams Bay

Dreams

Essays

Democrats are Authoritarian

—

by

wpuser
in

Here is a quote from Joseph Smith on the Democrats:

“I have sworn by the eternal God that I never will vote for a Democrat again; and I intend to swear my children, putting their hands under the thigh, as Abraham swore Isaac, that they will never vote a Democrat ticket in all their generations.  It is the meanest, lowest party in all creation.” (source, secondary source)

I’ve been having dreams recently telling me to write an essay explaining to a greater degree the problems with the democratic party, thus in this essay I will attempt to do so. This isn’t my first essay on politics, so for a greater picture see these my other essays: Politics and Conspiracies, Dangers of Covid Vaccines, 2020 Election Fraud, Race Blah Blah, Democrats Import Voters.

My position on politics is somewhat similar to my view on the Mormon Church. I believe the leaders of the Mormon church are corrupt / controlled by intelligence agencies / destined to eventually lead their people astray towards the dark side when the tribulation comes. Nevertheless, I still believe most of the Mormon doctrine is true, and much of this site is intended to explain these doctrines to an evangelical audience. Likewise, I believe (as per some of my dreams), that much of the leadership of the Republican party is corrupt and not serving their party’s interests; nevertheless, I think the ideas behind the Republican party are true (which my dreams seem to have confirmed).

Regarding Trump, I have seen people online (some of whom seem trustworthy) claim they have received revelations saying negative things about Trump. But all I have received are revelations saying that everyone else in the Republican party leadership is bad, and that they are going to betray Trump and Trump will lose power (hello fake information about to be released in the Epstein files). So, I can’t say that Trump is a “saint” or a “chosen man of God”; all I know is that Ted Cruise and the party establishment are likely more evil than Trump (Lord, I pray for more revelation on this matter in Christ’s name).

Here is an outline of this essay:

  • Federalism
  • Covid 19
  • Abortion / GBT
  • Free Speech
  • Can Democrats Think for Themselves?
  • Bias in Academic Institutions
  • Weaponization of Federal Agencies
  • The Twitter Files
  • Hate and Death
  • Jan 6
  • Russiagate
  • Democrats Donate to their Political Party Rather than Real Charity
  • Faking History
  • Disproving BLM
  • Hate Crime Hoaxes and Riots
  • Faking Transcripts of Trump
  • Debt
  • Why Debt grows Under Democrats
  • Conclusions

* sorry for making this essay so long – I could have split it into multiple articles, but I didn’t want it to look like this website is primarily about politics, as my main focus is religion.

Federalism

It seems obviously authoritarian to me to insist that the federal government control the education systems of states through the department of education, rather than granting states sovereignty on the matter. This is of course a violation of our whole constitution and philosophy of law – which is that the states should manage as much of the affairs of government as possible so that they can preserve their own independence. And philosophically, surely it is better to live in a world in which people get to decide which type of government they want to live in by choosing which state to move to, rather than one where people have almost no control at all over the governing system they inhabit.

This applies to most democrat issues: why should the federal government control healthcare – if healthcare is to be free, why not allow states to experiment with that? Why should the federal government provide welfare – can’t states provide their own residents welfare (and if states are too small for that, shouldn’t they be joined to larger states?) Why even should the federal government provide national parks – again, shouldn’t the states be allowed to manage those.

As an aside, I really hate the way national parks are run: I once got a river rafting permit to raft the Colorado river, and upon talking to the guides and completing the voyage I learned a lot of terrible stuff: Firstly, on any given day of the voyage we usually would meet on average only a single other rafting company. Which means that the river could realistically have 10x more rafters and still not be even close to “full”; and thus, the sometimes over a year long waitlist to get a permit to raft the river is completely pointless. The second thing I learned is: this is all because the national park service thinks that river rafters hurt the environment (magically) so they try as hard as they can to completely stop it (particularly because they are afraid of a special fungus which grows on the ground being hurt LOL). Which is all to say that the centralization of our parks seems to have only resulted in a very weird group of bureaucrats living in a 90% democrat metropolis (Washington D.C.) – who obviously don’t care very much about nature since they chose not to live near nature – having the ability to fulfill their fantasies of banning humans from nature.

And as another aside: if you want to make America’s healthcare system better, the only way to do so is to lower the salaries of doctors: the salaries of doctors in America are more than twice as high in Europe because of the immense doctor barriers to entry in America (other problems obviously include regulations/barriers to entry making medical equipment insanely expensive and the opaque pricing system of healthcare). Ignoring this and “fixing” healthcare via socialism and higher taxes only results in a lower rate of GDP growth, of which effect only compounds over time, and will have a negative trickle-down effect from rich to poor. [as another aside, my mom’s life was saved by a new and experimental procedure that wouldn’t have been available in socialized medical care countries, and which we certainly wouldn’t have been able to afford without American insurance][also, any research on Yandex will show you that medical procedures as simple as even MRIs in the UK and Canada are often delayed months because of socialism inefficiency.]

Covid 19

Need I explain this? Surely any intelligent reader should see that the democrats showed their true colors as authoritarians in their response to the pandemic. But just to recount the record:

  • The Democrats tried to force all large companies to require all their employees to be vaccinated.
  • Organ transplants were denied to the unvaccinated in some places (example).
  • Many things were closed for seemingly no reason, such as hiking trails.
  • Some countries tried to force schedules upon people of which days of the week they were allowed to leave their houses and which they had to stay inside.
  • Small businesses were legally required to close, thus ruining many people’s lives.
  • The government forcibly closed churches (source).

I wrote an essay about why the vaccines are bad here: Dangers of Covid Vaccines. Hopefully I will have time to update that essay because there are just so many terrible health problems we keep on learning about from these vaccines (for example: this study shows some health problems from the vaccines are much worse than the actual virus – which is probably because vaccine spike proteins are genetically engineered to be much more durable than the original proteins. And this is all of course only half of the story – it has now been proven that the hospital masks we were forced to wear at the beginning are very bad for your health.

Another crazy thing I learned is that HHS documents admit the CDC has never isolated any “covid-19 virus” – which is to say that if this is true, then the whole pandemic and all of its vaccines really were just a big lie.

Abortion / LGBT

Similar to how democrats have tried to force their gov’t policies upon the whole population through switching things from state level to federal level, the democrats also seem to have an obsession with forcing their morality upon the population, especially with regard to LGBT and abortion.

Abortion

  • The Harris administration intended to remove exemptions allowing catholic hospitals to be exempt from performing abortions, and to continue federal funding towards abortions (dailysignal).
  • Bidens administration attempted to force pro-life pharmicies to traffic abortion drugs (adflegal).
  • Silently praying outside abortion clinics is illegal in UK (theftp).
  • To stop pro-life people, any images of unborn mammals must be enclosed in an envelope with a warning label in a Canadian city (lifesitenews).
  • Democrats stop local  jurisdictions from requiring residents from seeing ultrasounds before performing abortions (apnews).
  • 22 Democrat states sue to stop congress from defunding planned parenthood (lifesitenews).
  • This is not as relevant but still funny: the DNC offered free abortions and vasectomies (nypost).
  • Many democrat states use state funds to pay for abortions (healthlaw).

LGBT

  • 52% of democrats think that businesses should be forced to bake custom cakes for LGBT weddings (cato).
  • Democrats try to force Catholic Hospitals to perform gender affirming surgeries (redstate).
  • Democrats attempt to take down faith based adoption agencies (heritage) and block agencies which refuse to work with LGBT parents (cnbc).
  • Since democrats let trans people into woman’s prisons, there are many horror stories of female inmates being raped over and over again by cell mates who are men pretending to be woman (example 1, example 2, example 3).
  • “Nearly 50 percent of male inmates identifying as female have been convicted of a sexual offense” (Breitbart).
  • One school attempted to cover up two sexual assaults in a girls bathroom by a transgender student, going so far as to threaten the parents if they go public with the story (thepostmillenial). Crazily enough, the school went on to approve the use of transgender students choosing which bathroom to use anyway even after all of this.
  • Female volleyball player, 17, left paralyzed with brain damage by transgender opponent who ‘cackled with delight’ after knocking her to the ground (dailymale).

Free Speech

* 12,000 Brits Arrested Every Year over Social Media Posts (source).
* British IT consultant arrested in Uk for linked in photo posted of him holding a shot gun in Florida (yahoo).

Along the same lines, democrats also have this weird obsession with banning free speech. This sort of is personal for me because I have been censured, banned, and shadow banned by a lot of social media companies, and I think I am on a list of people where AI automatically shadow bans anything I say if it is political. This article from CATO provides some pretty good statistics about the bias of leftists towards banning free speech. (need I explain how extremely absurd it is to claim that free speech can still exist if “hate speech” is banned?)

As you can see above, even for things that you think republicans would dislike more than democrats (such as criticizing white people or Christians), democrats are still more in favor of censorship. The same can be seen in the below statistic – Democrats are more in favor of ending free speech to protect white people, Christians, the police, and the military.

Can Democrats Think for Themselves?

Researchers have evaluated the effect of whether showing faces looking in the wrong direction distracts participants from correctly completing tasks. They have found that liberals exhibit a very large degree of distraction from said distracting faces, but conservatives aren’t distracted at all (springer). This implies that liberals are psychologically much more easily manipulated by their perceptions of others than republicans.

The phenomenon of the spiral of silence relates to this: in polls, people from Taiwan are more likely to not support an idea if it is presented as unpopular, while the reverse is true for Americans – if the pollsters present an idea as less popular, then Americans are more likely to support it. I think this dynamic explains a lot of political phenomenon – Democrat media likes to try to present right wing as unpopular (or pretending like they are far more racist / fascist than is actually the case) rather than directly and seriously addressing it, because from the Democrat mindset this sort of propaganda actually works. However, among conservatives, this has no effect, and actually the opposite is true – thus, the perception that everyone hated Trump actually made conservatives want to support him even more.

To me, it appears that liberals have allowed themselves to be manipulated by the journalist class to a much greater degree than republicans – and thus probably have a hard time relating to the degree of pain conservatives feel from being censured since democrat ideas are prevalent everywhere. This statistic shows how almost all donors to major media companies are democrat:

What’s funny is liberals don’t even seem to be aware of how biased the media is. The truth is that 94% of political donations from public media employees (like CNN or MSNBC) go to democrats (current).

And this statistic shows that democrats have very little diversity of thinking compared to conservatives:

Bias in Academic Institutions

What’s funny to me is democrats seem to be very unaware of how biased the institutions are towards them (and sometimes even think they are “rebels” for being democrat LOL). The following graphic is interesting in light of the fact that both conservatives and liberals underestimate the likelihood that their professor is liberal. The truth is, 93% of political donations from professors go to democrats (source), and this number is even higher for elite universities: 96% of ivy league professor’s political donations went to democrats (source).

As a result of the media and academic institutions being overwhelmingly democrat, Liberals have a hard time relating or understanding what it is like to be banned and censured.

This research is also interesting: Survey shocker: Liberal profs admit they’d discriminate against conservatives in hiring, advancement

“Psychologists Yoel Inbar and Joris Lammers, based at Tilburg University in the Netherlands, surveyed a roughly representative sample of academics and scholars in social psychology and found that ‘In decisions ranging from paper reviews to hiring, many social and personality psychologists admit that they would discriminate against openly conservative colleagues.’ …

More than a third of the respondents said they would discriminate against the conservative candidate. One respondent wrote in that if department members ‘could figure out who was a conservative, they would be sure not to hire them.’ …

Generally speaking, the more liberal the respondent, the more willingness to discriminate and, paradoxically, the higher the assumption that conservatives do not face a hostile climate in the academy.”

Weaponization of Federal Agencies

  • IRS targeted conservative organizations under Obama (source). Moreover, they went so far as to used inappropriate political screening criteria (keywords like “Tea Party,” “Patriot,” “9/12”) to flag tax-exempt applicants for heightened review, delay, and intrusive questionnaires (house).
  • Democrats are responsible for insane early morning swat team raids against conservatives in order to gather information for “investigations” that read like horror stories – including not giving women enough time to dress themselves, forbidding the family to call their lawyer or tell others about such raids, deliberately leaking personal information seized to media outlets, and even stealing all their electronics including their children’s electronics (example, example 2, example 3 – FBI raids homes of 35 trump allies, example 4, example 5, example 6).
  • According to recently released whistleblower records (2025), the FBI under the Department of Justice (DOJ) placed at least 92 Republican-aligned groups and individuals under scrutiny as part of the “Arctic Frost” probe in part of its larger investigation against Trump. These included groups like Turning Point USA (TPUSA), the Republican National Committee (RNC), and the Republican Attorneys General Association (washington examiner, senate).
  • The weird wave of sudden global enthusiasm for “trans rights” and novel ideas about gender turns out to have been largely funded by the US government through USAID grants’ (source).

Thousand Page Report

According to this massive report (here), the FBI has “has weaponized the federal government against its political opponents”. This report discusses how the FBI has “Altered and mischaracterized evidence to federal courts, circumvented safeguards, and exploited weaknesses … to target politically disfavored subjects and to protect favored ones”. According to whistleblowers in the document, the FBI’s Washington hierarchy is “rotted at its core”, full of “rampant corruption, manipulation, and abuse”, and has abused its powers to target conservatives.

This report discusses, among other things, 1) how the FBI is abusing its counterterrorism authorities to investigate parents who spoke at school board meetings; 2) how it is clearing itself of employees who dissent from its woke, leftist agenda; and 3) how it has wasted resources on political meddling, spied on conservatives, and has been deceptive and corrupt regarding Jan 6.

Hunter Biden laptop

51 former intelligence officials lie, claiming that Hunter Biden’s laptop was a Russian fake, when it was indeed real (source). What’s crazy about this story is that we only realized that the intelligence officials were lying after the election was over, so if the truth had come out that this was a massive fraud that could have shifted the 2020 election.

The Twitter Files

As said before, I have been banned by many social media companies and have noticed that if I comment on political things, no matter what I say it appears I am instantly shadow banned – probably because I am on some list for banning managed by AI. Moreover, I am pretty sure that my dad and I are on a blacklist of people not allowed to make websites on Amazon Web Services (AWS), because he was a rather prominent statistician proving the 2020 elections were a fraud and I had the same address as him when I tried to use AWS. During the 2020 election saga, my dad’s website was banned from Google search results – in that for certain keywords, his site would appear as the first result, but then one day we woke up and his website was no where to be found in their results (though still the number one result in other engines); needless to say, my dad was also banned on other social media platforms such as LinkedIn for discussing 2020 election fraud.

So, censorship is something near and dear to me. The thing about it is: it appears like tech leaders want people like me to not be able to voice our opinions, like, ever. So, I guess they wish I were dead? It’s funny that LGBT people like to fantasize about how conservatives want them to be dead (do they eagerly wait for conservatives to accidentally use the wrong pronouns so that they can tell all their friends about how they are *oppressed*?). But of course, no conservatives advocate for LGBT people to be banned on social media or for there to be any other punitive actions taken against them (other than I guess stopping them from going into Women’s restrooms LOL?). It’s like Leftists live in a fantasy world where they are all super proud of how they are oppressed, but the only real *oppression* in America is DEI and censorship – which all exclusively apply to the Leftist’s political enemies.

Back to the Twitter Files: They are worth noting because they definitively prove that social media has been banning people, shadow banning people, and limiting people’s visibility in order to further the left’s political agenda – even when no violations of terms of service occur. They also shine a light on how government agencies under Biden have been directly instructing companies on which accounts to ban (thus blurring the line between Government censorship and corporate censorship) and show how other platforms beyond Twitter have also been banning people. Finally, they show that leftists are psychopathic liars: Twitter executives spent years and years denying that they shadow banned or limited the visibility of conservatives, and that was all a lie. Moreover, it appears all this censorship involved entire departments with hundreds of people, yet despite the large number of people involved, they were still somehow able to keep this all a secret until Elon Musk bought Twitter.

So, without further ado, here are some of the revelations we learned from the Twitter files:

  • Twitter shadow banned and limited the visibility of right-wing users, those who criticized the covid lockdowns, and those who discussed 2020 election fraud. So, in other words, all the times twitter executives told us across the years that they didn’t shadow ban people, they were psychopathically lying. Moreover, Twitter allowed right wing activists to be doxed, but suspended right wing accounts for very minor infringements, like criticizing gender affirming care. Interestingly, Twitter also suppressed and blocked stories revealing that the democrats lied about the Hunter Biden laptop and (crazily enough), even prevented users from directly messaging each other about the laptop (source).
  • In Twitter’s war in favor of the covid lockdowns, it basically crazily censured all anti lockdown posts, regardless of whether they were actually lies or not. Moreover, Twitter directly took orders from the Biden admin on which accounts to suppress or ban (source).
  • The FBI told Twitter which accounts to suppress / block, and even paid Twitter for its staff’s time (source).
  • Twitter executives had weekly meetings with the FBI, Department of Homeland security and others (source), of which some discussed the Hunter Biden laptop story (source).
  • The FBI even created a social media-focused task force, known as FTIF, to help Twitter identify accounts to ban and also outsourced the task of identifying accounts to ban to left wing think tanks and shadowy private sector contractors. (source).
  • Twitter changed its entire user agreement policy to justify permanently banning Trump and banned many accounts which never violated specific Twitter policy. Beyond banning right wing accounts and covid naysayers for tweets which were demonstrably true, Twitter also received instructions to elevate certain accounts from the government. Funnily enough, in internal communications, Twitter’s “scaled enforcement team” collectively referred to Trump as “the leader of a terrorist group responsible for violence/deaths comparable to the Christchurch shooter or Hitler” LOL (source).
  • The Twitter files also showed that Facebook, Microsoft, Verizon, Reddit, even Pinterest and many other platforms also colluded with government agencies in banning or suppressing accounts (source).
  • 99.73% of Twitter’s campaign donations in 2022 went to Democrats (source).

Non-Twitter related stories:

  • Government Officials Have A Special Portal To Flag Facebook Posts For Censorship (source).
  • YouTube deletes 800,000 videos for coronavirus misinformation (bbc). Isn’t that astounding?

Hate and Death

For being the “party of love”, the democrats sure seem to not have any of it towards their political enemies (I’m guilty of this too; I’m sorry and I pray that I can stop being like that).

Similarly, according to Casey, Vanman, & Barlow (2023), in a set of four studies researchers found that liberals extended less empathy to suffering conservatives than conservatives did to suffering liberals (source).

Statistics like this are of course a result of democrats centering their message around accusing their political enemies of being “bad people” rather than simply saying they are factually wrong. Which of course only is a recipe for violence:

Charlie Kirk

The thing about the death of Charlie Kirk that was so surprising to me was not that the man actually died (after all, political assassinations aren’t all that uncommon) – but rather the insane gleeful reactions seen from many leftists.

What’s particularly disturbing about all this is, if you know anything about Charlie, he actually was very moderate (too moderate for me I guess). He was definitely not racist or bigoted in any way, didn’t really possess any controversial opinions, and represented mainstream palatable conservatism. So to see all these people online say that Charlie was a “nazi” or “fascist” and got what was coming for him – and then see people say that other (non-fascist) right wing people are magically also fascists – and then to see them glorify “punching nazis in the face” makes me realize: if these people saw the things I have written on this site, they would want me dead.

* It’s hard for me to properly express how much I despise the mindset that certain views are “bad” regardless of whether they are factually true or not. If something is True, then it isn’t bad. Period.

Zero Hedge has a good article (here) about the Charlie Kirk Assasination, of which here is a summary and elaboration:

  • Many democrats have responded to Charlie Kirk’s death by requesting other conservatives to die, such as Matt Walsh, Libs of Tik Tok, or Trump. Or, they have responded by defacing Kirk memorials.
  • When convicted criminals like George Floyd are killed (or rather die of drug overdoses), the response from Democrats seems to be to crazily burn and loot everything (the Floyd riots costed over 2 billion in property damages and killing 42 people). But when conservative heroes (who are not criminals) are killed (in a deliberate way, rather than accidental way), conservatives don’t respond by burning and pillaging, but rather by having uplifting, Christian worship services.
  • Conventional Democrat leaders have called for violence against Trump and his cabinet many times (source).
  • Democrats have called Trump and republicans fascists, which (beyond being simply wrong) is also implicitly calling violence upon them (source).
  • The majority of Democrats in the house voted against a resolution condemning political violence and honoring Charlie Kirk (source).
  • “What must not be lost here is that Democrats have normalized assassination culture. A decade of calling conservatives ‘fascists’ and ‘nazis’ has effectively created a master kill list of political enemies, fed to the far-left fringes in America that are now openly ‘planning for war against fascists.’” And here is an example of such rhetoric coming from Kamala Harris, where she calls Trump a fascist.

The other thing about the assassination that was crazy to me is the story about Dean Withers reaction to it. For those who don’t know, Dean Withers is a very famous young left-wing commentator who was known for arguing against Charlie Kirk. So anyway, Dean only learned that Charlie had died when he was on a live stream, and his immediate reaction was to start crying and saying that Charlie didn’t deserve to die.

While his reaction drew the applause of many conservatives, crazily enough, sobbing at Charlie Kirk’s death seemed to draw upon him the ire of his followers. As a result, he ended up having to make a video justifying why he cried to his followers (here is a clip). Moreover, (crazily enough) a few very famous democrat commentators decided that it would be appropriate to attack Dean for having too much sympathy towards Charlie Kirk and his family. And just to note, here is one quote from Dean that drew a lot of wrath:

“If you celebrate this [meaning the death of Charlie], if you don’t condemn it, if you’re happy, there is a clear line between me and you now. You are not a fan, I don’t support you, and I don’t want you to support me. If you claim to be an individual who wants to end gun violence, then you are contradicting your values to their core if you celebrate it. And if you see anybody celebrating it, happy with it, ok with it, please call them out.”

* So just again, it’s so obvious that Dean is right, that it is crazy to me that any famous leftists would oppose this, and yet they did as I will show.

Vaush

Here are some quotes from this video from him responding to Dean:

  • “Come on, you gonna nark on somebody because they’re happy that Hitler died?”
  • “We don’t need to like, you know, pretend to be sad over Hitler dying. I just don’t see why.”

And then throughout the video he proceeds to explain why Charlie Kirk deserved to die and thus why we don’t need to feel sorry for him.

Hasan Piker

Here is a quote from this clip of him. And just to cover any confusion, that clip isn’t from his official channel – his official account official account actually has 1.76 million subscribers (though I think his main platform is not YouTube).

  • “Charlie Kirk’s entire output like his entire political output is just straight up dehumanizing black people, brown people, gay people, trans people you know what I mean. Its just like that’s the whole thing that hes done. So when you see somebody [referring to Dean] who you thought was like defending you and defending your rights, defending your humanity all the sudden shed some real ass tears, it probably pisses people off or they think its not like a talking point for us, this is our lives.” [needless to say, Charlie kirk most definitely did not dehumanize anybody]

After this, he proceeds to explain why some leftists would be mad at people like Dean Withers who shed tears for Charlie Kirk’s death. He then ends with discussing how if you express grief for Charlie Kirk, black and brown people are going to think that you either agreed with him or are indifferent to the suffering of nonwhite people. [again, crazy – just because you feel sorry for someone doesn’t mean you agree with them]

Chris Cadence Show

This channel is smaller but is pretty funny. In summary, in the video we see a crazy black democrat attacking Dean Withers for not “listening” to black voices who were happy that Charlie Kirk died. Apparently only black people can understand the desire to celebrate assassinations since black people are marginalized LOL (here is the video).

Further Democrats

According to this report from Sky News (here), many leftist have celebrated the death of Charlie Kirk’s death, including not just fringe leftists, but also high up famous democrats basically saying Charlie Kirk had it coming for him as if he deserved it. Moreover, the video covers many examples of famous leftists glorifying the death of right wing figures (another compilation of leftists celebrating his death here).

Punching Nazis in the Face

This statistic is pretty disturbing, especially in light that if Charlie kirk is magically a “nazi” – when Charlie competes to be one of the least extreme conservative influencers – then I guess almost all conservative influencers deserve to be punched in the face. Including myself I guess (just to note: I am a Christian, so obviously I am not a Nazi).

This quote from a former Antifa member is interesting: “They don’t kill you because you’re a fascist, they call you a fascist so they can kill you… It is like calling a Nazi or a Fascist as a way to just dehumanize them, so you can do whatever to them. You could assault them. It’s funny to them. They laugh about it.” (zerohedge). This reminds me of how in 1943, the Communists sent a memo to the American communists on how to win the culture war: they advised to constantly repeat that their political enemies are either “nazis”, “fascists”, or “anti-semites”, assuring that if such accusations are repeated enough times, they would become eventually be accepted as fact in the public mind (source). Apparently, this has already have happened in the minds of leftists for individuals as moderate as Charlie Kirk.

Jan 6

In the year 2025, if you use search engines that are not google (hello Yandex), it is pretty clear that January 6 was a staged event by the democrats to make conservatives look bad.

Deliberate Lack of Security

  • In many cases, Capital police let people in to capital, thus people thought they were not trespassing and allowed to enter (source).
  • The Trump admin offered to send the national guard to the capital four days before January 6 because it was estimated that the police allocated for that event would be insufficient, however they were turned down (source, source 2). Despite this, democrats continue lying, blaming Trump for this, hoping social media censorship will cover their tracks I guess (source).
  • Despite spending years trying to blame Trump for the lack of security at the capital, hidden footage has been leaked showing Pelosi admitting that she was responsible for the lack of security (source).

Feds Pretending to be Protestors

  • Despite denying for years that any undercover FBI agents were embedded in crowds on Jan 6 pretending to be protestors, finally reports come out that there were in fact 274 FBI agents doing exactly that (source, source 2)(in the minds of a non-conspiracy theorist, conspiracies involving hundreds of people should not be possible, and yet here we are LOL). Yet, instead of apologizing to us for lying for years, democrat news outlets simply now have pivoted to saying that there is no evidence that said agents were actually inciting violence.
  • CIA officer & former FBI agent boasts about entraping Americans, targeting Alex Jones, and undercover FBI agents working the Capitol on January 6. “You can kind of put anyone in jail if you know what to do. You set them up… We call it a nudge.” (source).
  • Interestingly, during Jan 6, there is a video of a crowd of protestors chanting “Fed!” against a person (who has later been identified as “Epps”) inciting violence – and footage shows this same person leading the crowd in clashes against the police. If this accusation isn’t true, why is it that the FBI mysteriously scrubbed images of Epps from their website which asked for information about him, and never arrested or charged him? (source)
  • The person who planted the Pipe Bomb on Jan 6 clearly worked for the government and this was a failed false flag. Firstly, it has recently been discovered that this person was in fact a Capitol police officer who went on to work at the CIA (source). And secondly, for years we already knew this was a false flag before even knowing their identity, because of many extremely odd things about this event – such as how the footage of the pipe bomb being planted was clearly tampered with and how much of it was deleted for no good reason (source) – and because this was leaked and many other bizarre things (see the first source).

Blaming Trump

  • During Jan 6, the media spliced two segments from his speech that were 54 minutes apart to make it seem like Trump told people to go to the capitol and fight like hell (theguardian).

The Cover Up

  • An FBI hero (who reportedly didn’t even vote for Trump) lost his security clearance and was arrested after complaining about unjust swat raids against Jan 6 protestors and dishonest/illegal FBI practices to distort Jan 6 events (source).
  • Days before republicans took the house, the Jan 6 committee deleted hundreds of files (source).
  • The FBI purged from among its ranks conservatives, Jan 6 whistleblowers, and vaccine skeptics under the Biden administration (source).

Injustice

  • The FBI moved members away from investigating child sex trafficking to tracking down January 6 attendees (national review).
  • Jan 6 protestors held for years without trial in solitary confinement (source, source 2).
  • D.C. Jury Convicts Great-Grandma For Walking Around The Capitol For 10 Minutes On Jan. 6 (thefederalist).

Russiagate

  • The FBI rewrote the transcript of an interview with General Flynn in order to make it look like he lied and prosecute him, and then Robert Mueller’s special counsel investigation threatened to charge Flynn’s son with lobbying violations if he didn’t plead guilty to making false statements to the FBI (source 1, source 2).
  • The Obama administration leaked classified information about general Flynn in order to discredit him and thus perpetuate their foreign policy agenda in Iran, which is a felony (source).
  • All of the stuff about Trump colluding with Russia was completely false, and the Obama admin knowingly disseminated the lies anyway, and used this as an excuse to spy on the Trump team (source, source 2). This includes the claim that Russia hacked the DNC (when actually the leaked emails were from an internal leaker). Thus, Russiagate is basically the same as the watergate scandal – both involving the government illegally spying on political opponents and then trying to cover it up.
  • Government staff were reportedly threatened by supervisors into making false claims about Russian interference (zerohedge).
  • “The real scandal behind Russiagate was … the criminal conspiracy by Obama and his administration to sabotage the 2016 election and subsequently to overthrow the Trump presidency and the democratic will of the American people. Tulsi Gabbard, the nation’s most senior intelligence chief, has said that this amounts to “treason,” and she has called for the prosecution of Obama and other former senior aides.” (source).
  • Russia Hoax Whistleblower Threatened, Multiple Attempts to Report Wrongdoing Were Ignored
  • According to a whistleblower, Adam Schiff approved intel leaks to smear Trump and thought he’d be CIA chief if Hillary Clinton won (nypost, townhall).

Even during Trump’s first term, the deep state attempted to foil the investigation of Russiagate and worryingly even Trump appointees participated in the cover up. In the first four months of the investigation, the investigators were denied access to any computers at all. Even after being allowed access to computers, they were only allowed to use special computers held in the building without ever leaving any realm of their work be taken off said computers or taken home. And these special computers deliberately had malware installed on them which made them unstable and unreliable, purposely to slow down the investigations. The investigators repeatedly requested “proper computers” but were never granted them. They were also denied software tools that would have allowed them to efficiently search large volumes of classified and unclassified reporting at the agency and thus could only access the material in its paper form which was often quite disorganized. Moreover, for many months, the investigators were not even allowed to communicate with the five people designated to be the authors of the report. Ultimately, in an ultimate betrayal, top Trump appointees buried the reports of Russiagate and demanded that no parts of the reports be declassified before the 2020 election (zerohedge).

Democrats Donate to their Political Party Rather than Real Charity

* Because to them “charity” means stealing money from people and giving it to others Robinhood style.

(promarket)

Faking History

Here some examples of how democrats have faked US history to serve their political cause (only possible because they dominate academia, government bureaucracy, and schools):

  • American history textbooks have been filled with lies and exaggerations about the “robber barons” in order to make us hate capitalism (source).
  • Some leftists have claimed that somehow the revolutionary war was actually fought to uphold Slavery (source).
  • The left has famously disseminated many ridiculous lies about Christopher Columbus, such as that he committed genocide, or deliberately spread diseases, or started the slave trade, or sold woman as sex slaves, or cut off Native Americans hands. Leftists have even gone so far as to make up quotes from Columbus to defame him (random source, another random source, random source again).
  • The left made up and falsified sources to perpetuate the myth that settlers disseminated “small pox blankets” to native Americans. Moreover, they gloss over many important aspects of Indians – such as A) how they mostly died to disease, B) much of our conflicts with them were actually a result of the native Americans selling land to us but then reneging on their deal, and C) how native Americans had a culture of torturing people to death slowly over several days (source). Here is a funny quote from the article: “In 1675, King Philip’s War broke out because, in the words of Indian Chief King Philip, ‘These missionaries are screwing up Indian life. They’re telling us to stop torturing people. They’re telling us not to kill our captives. That’s going to mess up our whole culture.’”
  • One of the first federal laws George Washington signed on becoming the president said that you can’t have land unless you bought it from the Indians, and you must be able to show the title deed for said land (same source as before).
  • For those who have been taught that Native Americans did not engage in cannibalism, you are simply wrong – beyond a huge number of accounts from settlers attesting otherwise (such as how the Texans made alliances with cannibal tribes in the fight against the Comanches and tolerated watching said tribes cannibalizing Comanches after winning battles against them – source 1, source 2, source 3), we also have archeological evidence proving this is the case (The Seattle Times).
  • The story of the “trail of tears” is completely false. The Indians actually received lands and monetary compensation for their moving territories, and weren’t forcibly deported, but rather voluntarily chose to leave (source).

The 1800s Wars between the Texans and the Comanches

* I think this specific story is important for the reader to understand our relationship with the Native Americans.

In summary, the Comanches were crazy – they would do thousand-mile journeys into Texan territory to raid towns or even to attack a single family, and would torture their captives to death in the most brutal fashion. The biggest war between the Texans and the Comanches started after the Comanches offered to return to the Texans all of their prisoners, but only returned a single woman – who had been relentlessly raped and tortured, to the point that when she was returned her entire nose had been burnt off to the bone. After this woman revealed that the Comanches were lying when they said she was their only prisoner and still had more prisoners (being horrifically tortured in the same fashion she was) which they were hoping to release later in order to gain more concessions from the Texans, the war started (as discussed here). Here is one quote from the article:

“But the Comanche tribe’s furious response knew no bounds. When the Texans suggested they swap the Comanche prisoners for their captives, the Indians tortured every one of those captives to death instead.
‘One by one, the children and young women were pegged out naked beside the camp fire,’ according to a contemporary account. ‘They were skinned, sliced, and horribly mutilated, and finally burned alive by vengeful women determined to wring the last shriek and convulsion from their agonised bodies. Matilda Lockhart’s six-year-old sister was among these unfortunates who died screaming under the high plains moon.’
They were infamous for their inventive tortures, and women were usually in charge of the torture process.”
The article goes on to discuss several different insane ways the Comanches tortured people to death.

Moreover, much of the problem that the Texans faced with the Comanches was that the federal government blocked the Texans from pursuing the Comanches into their territory after the raids since their territory was protected (no doubt the New England elite in the 1800s had a different perspective of the Indians than the Texans). Thus, the Comanches were able to repeatedly raid Texas without retribution. It was only after one famous ranger declared “My job was to find and fight Indians, not to learn geography” before pursuing the Indians back into their territory after a raid that the tide finally turned against the Comanches (archive). Thus, far from the federal government unfairly persecuting the plains Indians, the reality was that the feds helped and protected the Comanches, allowing them to abduct and torture women and children without any retribution, as part of their New England political games.

Disproving BLM

Before discussing the vast amount of property damage, theft, and death as a result of BLM – which obviously is part of the democratic party industrial complex – let me just quickly disprove a few of the claims of BLM: namely, that they are mistreated by police:

* So obviously the above statistic shows that Black people are not being treated unfairly by the police, and are disproportionately arrested for selling drugs because they disproportionately use drugs.

Hate Crime Hoaxes and Riots

Now that I have settled that the complaints of BLM are absurd, let’s go over the immense amount of dishonesty and damage caused by riots associated with BLM.

Ferguson Riots (2014-2015)
This article (city journal) explains the Fergusson Riots well: “Wilson was a cop, and Brown had just robbed a convenience store, violently overpowering the clerk. When Wilson tried to stop him in the street, Brown scuffled with him, reaching inside his police SUV through the driver’s window. Brown then ran off and Wilson gave chase. At some point, Brown turned around and charged Wilson. That was when Wilson killed him.” The article goes on to discuss how the accusations that Brown had tried to surrender, pleading with the cop to not shoot, are completely false and made up.

  • In other words, what actually happened was a young black man who was high on pot reached for a cops gun and was then killed (amren).
  • The riots resulted in 25 businesses being burned down (dailydot), 14 people injured, 82 people arrested (nypost), and numerous businesses looted (npr).

Baltimore Riots over Freddie Gray (2015)

  • These riots started after Freddie Gray died due to spinal cord injury inflicted during his ride in a police van following a spat where police detained him for running away from them rather than cooperating.
  • Three out of six of the officers charged with his death were black (CBS).
  • The riots resulted in 24 police officers injured and 19 buildings torched, including a $16 million senior center providing affordable housing (nypost), with 351 businesses reporting damage or inventory loss from looting (news24).
  • “Gray had a criminal record with 18 prior arrests, on drug charges, three separate assault charges, and minor crimes and had spent time in jail.” (Wikipedia)

Milwaukee Riots over Sylville Smith (2016)

  • The riots started when a cop shot a man who refused to drop his stolen handgun. They resulted in four officers injured, three squad cars damaged, and multiple businesses burned down. Funnily enough, in the 24 hours prior to this shooting, five African Americans were fatally shot by other African Americans, but of course people only riot when cops shoot black people (city-journal).
  • Both the cop and the man shot were black (Wikipedia).
  • The man who was shot had an extensive arrest record including for a shooting (jsonline).
  • Crazy rioters yelling “Beat up every white person!” (YouTube).
  • Said riots involved much looting and arson (source 1, source 2).

national review has a good article about this:

  • Rioters burned cars, looted stores, and attacked the police.
  • According to one protestor, the riots actually happened because because “rich people, they got all this money, and they not . . . trying to give us none.”

George Floyd riots (2020)

  • As we all know, these riots came after George Floyd died while in police custody.
  • George Floyd died of an overdose – this isn’t an “internet rumor” – his blood had 3 times the fatal dose of fentanyl (as well as meth and cocaine). Moreover, the county autopsy report says he died of a heart attack, and states that there were “no life-threatening injuries” and no evidence for “traumatic asphyxia or strangulation” (this source is very good and is worth reading if you don’t believe me).
  • Floyd already began to complain “I can’t breathe” a few minutes before the neck restraint was applied, while resisting the officers when they tried to get him into the squad car. Fentanyl affects the breathing, causing death by respiratory arrest (same source).
  • The restraint technique used on George Floyd Was actually part of officer training (zerohedge).
  • Floyd was foaming at the mouth when confronted with the police – so obviously already in the midst of a drug overdose (amren).
  • Floyd was charged in the past with aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon (the-sun) and of course was stopped in this incidence for passing counterfeit currency.
  • The riots costed over 2 billion in property damages, and killed 42 people.
  • Nearly 500 businesses in Minneapolis had been vandalized, looted, or smashed into as a result of the rioting, and at least 67 businesses were completely burned to the ground (westernjournal).
  • Rioters ransacked and torched a police station during the riots (chicagotribute).

Beyond Riots

It appears that many of the “hate crimes” reported in the US end up being fake. This list documents 185 of such hoaxes. It sure seems like black people and others sure like to feel like there are oppressed.

Moreover, the policy outcomes of BLM (beyond just the damage caused by its riots), have also been very terrible:

Faking Transcripts of Trump

  • As previously said, during Jan 6, the media spliced two segments from his speech that were 54 minutes apart to make it seem like Trump told people to go to the capitol and fight like hell (theguardian).
  • People (including even Obama and Biden) lied about a Trump speech to make it seem like he called white supremacists “fine people” when all he did was say that many people on both sides are “fine people” (nypost, thenewamerican).
  • Trump now suing BBC and other news outlets for altering his speeches to make it seem like he said things that he never said via splicing together parts of sentences that were originally disconnected (dailymail).

Debt

  • Its empirically true that when republican governors are elected, the default risks of States goes down (source).
  • Using regression discontinuity researchers show that states electing republican governors has a causal impact on lowering state debt (source, alternate link).
  • Across OCD countries, the more leftist governments are, the higher the deficit is (source).

(source)

Why Debt Grows under Democrats

Here are some statistics that might help explain why democrats aren’t able to decrease deficit:

Firstly, it’s almost impossible for Democrats to downsize the federal government, because they are responsible for creating regulations making it almost impossible to fire federal employees. That is why we have seen Republicans threaten to use the gov’t shutdown to fire people, and why we see in the news how republicans want to ease these restrictions on firing (source 1, source 2), and democrats want to continue blocking firing employees (source 1, source 2).

Another thing worth noting is: the only expenditure in government the democrats seem willing to cut is military spending, which is funny because even if we entirely got rid of our military, we would still have a deficit (our military spending hovers around 900 billion, and the deficit is 1.8 trillion) – and raising taxes won’t necessarily help either because of the Laffer curve: increases in tax rates result in a decreasing GDP, thus actually decreasing government revenue.

* including state and local expenditures, the total amount of gov’t spending is 37% of our GDP.

Another silly lie from the democrats is that: increasing welfare will actually help our economy by helping lift people out of poverty. This is simply not true:

The fact that increasing welfare doesn’t end the cycle of poverty should have been obvious from the beginning because: Lifetime earnings are about 50% heritable, with shared environment being negligible. Thus, the only reason why children tend to have high incomes if their parents have high incomes is because of genetics, and excluding the influence of genetics, the type of home you are raised in (on average) has no impact on income. And if you don’t believe me, researchers have furthermore proved that the income of adopted children matches that of biological parents and has no resemblance to adopted parents. So just to emphasize: the idea that if a child’s family is poor he will also grow up to be poor because he is lacking in opportunities is completely false. If this was true, then the shared environment of children in twin studies would actually have an effect on children’s income, except it doesn’t. Here is just one more statistic on that:

Education

Democrats obsess with thinking that increasing public school spending will improve the quality of education, but this simply is not the case. Rather, the truth is that public schools waste an exceedingly large amount of money. According to this review of various studies (here), the average per pupil spending at private school schools is 57.3% of what is seen in public schools (with catholic schools spending even less) – thus attesting to the fact that public schools spend far more than is necessary.

Conclusions

Unfortunately, an epidemic of lies has slowly been overtaking modern day America. Here in this essay (and in others on this site) I have tried my best to address and remedy this mind virus. Here are some of the points that I have hoped to cure:

  • We have been lied to about global warming.
  • There is no cycle of poverty – people aren’t poor because their parents were poor and thus they lacked opportunities, because genes are vastly and overwhelmingly more important than childhood environment.
  • African Americans are not oppressed.
  • The democrats knowingly rig elections.
  • It’s not immoral to say that white countries tend to be better than nonwhite countries – this is fact, and truth is not immoral. Consequently, it’s not immoral to oppose the great replacement, which has resulted in an immense amount of suffering through crime.
  • There is a deliberate attempt by democrats to demographically alter our country so that it becomes a one-party state.
  • The Covid 19 vax is harmful.
  • Democrat leaders and the mainstream media are evil and not to be trusted and their policies are stupid.
  • Social media and search engines censor everything you see to make you believe lies.
  • LGBT and abortion are bad.
  • We have been lied to about American history to make the white man seem evil.
  • People don’t comprehend the truly nefarious nature of the deep state – of which I have only covered surface level in this essay; the rabbit hole goes much further into the occult and child trafficking.

But if America is to be destroyed, why does any of this matter? I guess my thoughts on that are: correctly understanding politics has a huge link to religion, and many people don’t believe in Christ because they subscribe to an anti-Christian political party. Moreover, correctly understanding which guys are “the bad guys” likely will help people see the beast system as it is when it comes (and not be tricked into believing dumb things like the idea that Trump is the antichrist). Finally, I think there is a spiritual consequence to accepting as fact things that are false – and so we should be trying our best to restore ourselves to the truth in a sort of spiritual cleanse, thus allowing us greater access to the holy spirit.

There seems to be an alliance between the forces of darkness, elements of the deep state, and leftism as a whole. Just look at the logo of Antifa – arrows pointing down and to the left. Is it really a coincidence that left and down coincide with the directions of Satanism? Or has Satan been manipulating the thought processes of antifa and leftists in general? What are the chances that leftism could *literally* be wrong about everything (which appears to be the case), other than that when you accept and act on one Satanic lie, that grants Satan a greater ability to manipulate you on other fronts, thus leading to a polarization of light versus darkness.

It seems to be true that belief in Christianity has a causal impact leading you to be more conservative. Well, I posit that the reverse is true: being conservative also has a causal impact on making you more Christian. I guess that is the largest motive for my writing this essay, which was sort of an odyssey. If any part of this is false, I am sorry.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *