I have heard people discuss how in religion there are open handed concepts and close handed concepts. I think the same applies in politics: in the libertarian field of politics – how much welfare should be disseminated, what degree of taxing the rich should be implemented, etc. – I feel like it is hard to entirely “disprove” or “prove” anything, since these are questions of philosophy rather than fact; thus, these are more open-handed concepts. But some political concepts are just factually not true – for example, global warming is simply not true (as shown in Politics and Conspiracies). This is (in my mind) a close-handed concept, with no room for debate.
The immigration debate falls into the camp of mostly “close handed” (though I guess the question of skilled immigration is more open handed).
For my whole life I have been taught my whole life that immigrants are the strength of our nation. I have been told more times than I count that immigrants are more hard working than native born Americans – as if we need immigrants to do jobs because we are too lazy to do them ourselves. As if we should be embarrassed to not be immigrants ourselves, and immigrants are somehow more “American” than native born Americans.
This idea is very easy to disprove (which is why I think it is a “close handed” topic). So, I will disprove this idea here, and then I will propose some ideas pertaining to why I think we have been propagandized into having such a positive view of immigration in America (which is namely that immigrants have more leftist political views than Americans and are willing to work for less).
* And just to note, this essay is broadly addressed to immigrants from third world countries. Thus, firstly, this essay isn’t discussing immigration between countries that are already westernized. And secondly, this essay this essay won’t excessively differentiate between immigrants from South America or the middle east; I have seen a huge number of statistics for both groups (of which I will show a few in this essay), and every problem (from welfare usage, to crime, to political views, to lack of innovation) that is present in one group is also present in the other. Perhaps there is one special third world country that defies the stereotype, but again, identifying outliers is not the purpose of this essay – all I aim to prove here is that *on average*immigration from third world countries has not been very awesome.
* Democrats will say that these problems go away with assimilation: Firstly, this is simply not true (as you will see from some of the statistics here, as well as statistics I showed in Race Blah Blah). Secondly, it seems like insane reckless behavior to risk the entire future of western civilization (because literally every single western country right now is inundated with immigration) upon the assumption that all statistics showing the effects of immigration will magically reverse. Thirdly, this ignores the most obvious causality of immigration problems, which is that it is hard to succeed when your genetics aren’t very good (I am only speaking in terms of averages here)(also, my genes aren’t very awesome either – I’m not saying we should hate people like myself who have bad genes, and largely I think it is good for us to ignore and look past genes, just not with regard to immigration); I discuss this more in Race Blah Blah. So just to emphasize – having willful ignorance about genes may in fact make you a good person, because probably we shouldn’t focus too much on genes – but when the fate of western civilization hangs in the balance, the line between willful ignorance and reckless endangerment blurs. Seeing genes have a permanent impact on countries as the immigrant’s children and grandchildren etc. inherit the initial immigrant’s genes for all time, and most attributes of humans are at least 50% heritable, if you are unwilling to worry about the question of genes, then you obviously aren’t factoring in all the potential risks of immigration and therefore aren’t a “serious” person worthy of making important policy decisions regarding immigration.
And fourthly – the argument that these problems go away with assimilation is basically an admittance that immigrants do have problems – which means that the decades of rhetoric that immigrants are the most awesome thing ever are complete lies. Thus, if you are going to use the assimilation argument, you have to lead with an apology for lying to the public for years first about how immigrants are somehow “better” than native born people.
** I’m sorry this essay is sort of mean. I am a bad person. Forgive me…
Immigrants Are Not Hard Working
Immigrants Are a Financial Burden
Immigrants from Third World Countries are Not Creative Geniuses
Refugees are Fake
Firstly (as many before me have said) any refugees that get to America or Europe must pass through many other countries which they could have stopped at. So, by the time they actually get to a country like the UK, they are no longer truly in need of refuge from their original country, but rather are choosing to live in whatever country offers them the best economy / highest benefits. So, the logic that we should be guilt tripped into letting in refugees is fake and dumb, especially considering that resettling refugees in western countries is vastly more impractical and costly than resettling them in countries more similar to their own:
Immigrants Disproportionately Commit Crime
Motivations
So why have we been lied to for decades about how awesome immigrants are? In my view, there are two reasons: Firstly, the rich understand that immigration lowers the wage – thus further enriching themselves. This is sort of a “looter” mindset, because the only end outcome of immigration is that the country will become much more socialist (as statistics show) – and thus it is as if the rich are trying to loot as much wealth from America before America collapses. Indeed, I believe the recent rise in income inequality in America is directly a result of immigration.
And secondly, because elements of our society want to radically transform our society to become much more leftist and so are trying to import voters in to do that. Here are some statistics:
- Since at least 1976, republicans would have won every single presidential election if only white people voted.
- Nonwhite people are more against free speech than democrats. Moreover, among democrats, white democrats are more in favor of free speech than nonwhite democrats.
- White people on average are even more capitalist than republicans, and nonwhite people on average are even more communist than democrats.
Regarding Merit Based Immigration
As you saw in the above statistics, Asian Americans very much in favor of the government socializing companies, to a much greater degree than even democrats or black people. Moreover, in 2020, 72% of Indian Americans said they supported Biden, compared to just 22% for Trump (source). Thus, it sure seems even merit based migration needs to be reconsidered, given it seems like the only predictable outcome of the rise in Asian Americans is that America will move towards socialism (and the election of Mamdani proves this).
Yes, Asian Americans are smart, but if our only goal is make the average IQ of America go up, we don’t need to replace our people with another race who (on average) hate our values and will lead us towards destruction. All we need to do is stop third world immigration and deport people.
Ultimately, why do we even need foreigners? Americans already are very smart and industrious (despite the stereotypes saying other wise). In fact, white Americans score better in Pisa math tests than every single European country except Estonia and Switzerland (and I’m sure we have many states which are much bigger than those tiny countries that are more educated than they)(source)
Conclusion
Americans have by psychopathically lied to for years about immigration be “good”, and we have been disrespected and slandered for years about how we are lazy and need to be replaced. Well, that is all false, and all it does is show the true nature of leftism: Lies supported by censorship whenever they are called out, and replacing voters instead of engaging in honest conversation with them.
Leave a Reply