Contents

Why I wrote this

* if you haven’t read my essay Judaism Idle Talk, that might be a better place to start. That essay discusses the political views of Jewish people, while this essay discusses the disproportionate positions of power that Jewish people occupy. Thus, this essay won’t seem important unless you understand why Jewish power is bad – namely, because Jewish people have really stupid political opinions on average.

I recently had a dream telling me to write an essay about how “Jews control the world”; so evidently my first essay Judaism Idle Talk wasn’t adequate, which is why I wrote this one.

I’m not exactly sure why Judaism matters so much on my website; presumably, the Jews will play a role during the tribulation which is why this topic is worth discussing.

Just to note, before my dreams, I wasn’t obsessed with the Jews. Rather, I have largely only learned in depth negative things about Jews in response to my dreams.

Also *I am not a Nazi*. I am a Christian, so of course I am not a Nazi. I don’t want to kill Jews, I don’t want to hurt Jews, I love everyone of all races and creeds and wish goodness upon all humanity *including Israel and the Jews*. So, let’s calm down LOL. Think of me as a historian simply trying to be as accurate as possible in explaining the world.

* also before banning me, I ask you this: is what I am saying factually true or not? How can something be evil if you aren’t even sure if it is false?

Jewish Academics

Usually, the question of Jewish power ends up going as follows: Yes, Jews are overrepresented, but that is simply because they are really smart. This issue is addressed very well in the insanely long article The Myth of American Meritocracy (which was validated here). So, here below I present a review of that article (plus a few of my thoughts).

Originally, the research in said article was started to see if IB league colleges really are discriminating against Asians (as is oft asserted), but unlike other research, this study decided to differentiate between white non-Jewish students and Jewish students in the analysis. They found ironically that, after controlling national merit scholarships, Asian students actually receive preferential treatment compared to non-Jewish white students. It only appears that Asians are discriminated against when you lump Jews in with whites, because Jewish students receive a vast amount of preferential treatment by schools (which I will discuss in depth). Another thing discussed is that academic performance among Jews has hugely declined from what it used to be, but I won’t discuss this for sake of brevity.

But before getting too deep into the results, let me first just explain the basic principles behind how this research was possible: we know that certain names are basically always Jewish (such as Rosenberg), and we know approximately how many people in the US population have those names. So, for example, to estimate how overrepresented Jews are among national merit scholars, all we need to do is see the number of people with the name “Rosenberg” who get national merit scholarships, compare this to the total number of Rosenbergs in the US population, and then contrast this to the likelihood that people with more conventional names would receive national merit scholarships. Thus, we use Jewish names as a proxy for Jews as a whole – so for example, if a typical Jewish name like Rosenberg is overrepresented by, say, a factor of two, then we would assume that the Jewish population as a whole is also overrepresented by this same factor. This therefore bypasses the problem of “some Jews have names that are indiscernible from gentile names”, allowing unbiased estimates of Jewish success in academics. This same principle applies for other races – for example, to estimate how overrepresented Asians are, all we would need to do is see how overrepresented specific Asian last names (like Wang) are to the overall population of Wangs – and then extrapolate this to the entire population of Asians, operating under the assumption that the patterns in the overall Asian population mirror that which is seen for the population of people with the last name Wang.

* One thing to note about other studies estimating Jewish population at universities is that they tend to underestimate Jews because they only count people with *proper* Jewish last names as Jewish – even though many Jews have identical names to gentile names. For the aforementioned reasons, this study bypasses that.

Jewish Intelligence

Ok, on with the study: based on the overall distribution of America’s population, it appears that approximately 65–70 percent of America’s highest ability students (as measured by rates of national merit scholarship) are non-Jewish whites, well over ten times the Jewish total of under 6 percent (with the remaining national merit scholars being Asian).

Thus, we would expect Jews to occupy slightly under 6% of seats in elite colleges, yet instead we see them taking approximately a quarter of the student body population, thus making the Jewish population in elite colleges equal to or slightly exceeding the population of non-Jewish whites.

Moreover, using national merit scholarships as a proxy for intelligence actually overestimates Jewish intelligence, because 1) Jews mainly only have high verbal intelligence and are more average in other forms of intelligence, and 2) the national merit scholarship program is very heavily weighted towards verbal intelligence and away from quantitative reasoning (thus biasing it against Asians, who are the reverse of Jews in that they mainly excel in quantitative reasoning). Regarding more analytical intelligence, Ashkenazi Jews actually only have an IQ of 98 for visual spatial intelligence (source)[as an aside, surely in the 21^st century Jewish dominance in banking should be subsiding since Jews are not excellent at math, right?]. It’s also worth noting that many protestant denominations also have a very high verbal IQ and those raised in the Anglican or Episcopal church actually have a higher verbal IQ than Jews.

On Asians

If we are searching for the *smartest* group in America, this group surely is the Asians. At 3.3% of the population of California, Jews only make up 5% of its national merit scholars. Contrast this to Asians, who represent 57% of national merit scholars despite being only 17% of California’s population. Thus, Asian students are three times more likely to have high academic performance than Jews.

Consequently, per the population and test scores, there should be at least five times more Asians than Jews in elite colleges, but in reality there are actually about twice as many Jews than Asians in such colleges.

Preferential Treatment Towards Jews

Most interestingly, the study quantifies how much Jews are overrepresented by IB league colleges relative to what we would expect given their rate of receiving national merit scholarships:

At Harvard, Jews are overrepresented by a ratio of 435% relative to what would be expected, “while the residual ratio for non-Jewish whites drops to just 28 percent, less than half of even the Asian figure. As a consequence, Asians appear under-represented relative to Jews by a factor of seven, while non-Jewish whites are by far the most under-represented group of all, despite any benefits they might receive from athletic, legacy, or geographical distribution factors. The rest of the Ivy League tends to follow a similar pattern, with the overall Jewish ratio being 381 percent, the Asian figure at 62 percent, and the ratio for non-Jewish whites a low 35 percent, all relative to their number of high-ability college-age students.”

* so, for Harvard, if you are Jewish, you appear to be 435/28= 15.5 times more likely than a non-Jewish white to be accepted while holding academics equal.

To go into depth, each Harvard class includes roughly 400 Jews and 800 Asians and non-Jewish whites; this total represents over 40 percent of America’s highest-ability Jewish students, but merely 5 percent of their equally high-ability non-Jewish peers. This contrasts with Caltech, which is known for being one of the most meritocratic schools: At Caltech, only 5.5% of students are Jewish – which is about what you would expect would happen in a fair world, and similar statistics are seen in other universities which have moved towards more meritocratic systems.

Here are some graphics that show the degree to which Jewish students crowd out all other groups:

So just to emphasize: there are over 10 times more non-Jewish white students than Jewish students who are high performing, yet there are an equal if not slightly higher number of Jews in our top colleges than non-Jewish whites. This results in “affirmative action” being much more extreme than we ever thought: while everyone was complaining that it was unfair for affirmative action to require an equal proportion of white students as Black and Hispanic students to attend colleges (since white students have better academics than nonwhite students on average) – the truth is actually even more extreme: putting aside academics, a higher proportion of black and Hispanic students go to such colleges, because all of the slots that were supposed to be reserved for “white students” actually were taken by Jewish students.

Harvard Could Easily fill Itself with High Qualified Students but Doesn’t

“Harvard could obviously fill its entire class with high-scoring valedictorians or National Merit Scholars but chooses not to do so. In 2003, Harvard rejected well over half of all applicants with perfect SAT scores, … and in 2010 Princeton acknowledged it also admitted only about half… In fact, a former Senior Admissions Officer at Harvard has claimed that by the mid-2000s as few as 5 percent of the students at highly selective universities such as his own were admitted purely based on academic merit.

It is important to note that these current rejection rates of top scoring applicants are vastly higher than during the 1950s or 1960s, when Harvard admitted six of every seven such students and Princeton adopted a 1959 policy in which no high scoring applicant could be refused admission without a detailed review by a faculty committee.”

“Harvard’s apparent preference for academically weak Jewish applicants seems to be reflected in their performance once they arrive on campus.”

“The top 10% of each Harvard class is inducted into Phi Beta Kappa, the national honors society, and the university’s PBK rosters of the last fifty years are available on the Internet.
Thirty or forty years ago, Jewish names were very common on the PBK lists, but more recently they have dropped to fairly low levels. It appears that Harvard’s non-Jewish whites are now perhaps five times as likely as their Jewish classmates to achieve such high academic performance, with Asian students doing nearly as well.” (see this quote in the appendix here).

* to note one detail here: it appears that white students at Harvard are actually even better performing than Asian students, which aligns with the previous statistics that it is in fact easier for Asians to enter IB league schools compared to whites.

In Group Bias

So how did we get to a point where our most prestigious institutions are operated in a non-meritocratic fashion, as one would have expected to only find in third world countries?

In my view, the west tends to create high social capital institutions. Such institutions are ran on trust, the upside being that if people actually are trustworthy then said institutions can be much more efficient than less trusting institutions, but the downside being that they are vulnerable to players who are willing to exploit the system.

I believe Jewish advocate groups have exploited this weakness. They relentlessly pressure college administrators to accept more Jewish students and then threaten to cancel them if they don’t for being antisemitic. And being naïve, the administrators assume that all this pressure is because Jewish students must actually have some merit (because that is normally the case when someone hugely pressures a student to be admitted). Ultimately, the administrators just go along with it, because it is the easiest thing to do – after all, who would believe or care anyway if they pushed back – in today’s culture it is just extremely unacceptable to even slightly hint that Jewish people receive preferential treatment.

Another thing worth noting is: academic institutions are dependent on letters of recommendation – and while normally students have to earn said letters – since Jews have such in group bias, it seems likely that many Jewish faculty would be willing to give glowing letters of recommendation to any student who is a fellow Jew out of a sense of kinship (the story of Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan, which I discuss later, exemplifies this). Embarrassingly enough, I have seen this phenomenon happen among Mormons as well – where some Mormons might give good letters of recommendation to Mormon students on account of a kinship between them even if such letters weren’t really earned. However, I don’t think Mormons are as overrepresented as Jews, so I imagine this problem is much larger for Jews (especially since there isn’t any Mormon doctrine that Mormons are somehow superior or more intelligent than the rest of the population; also, I think most Mormons would be ashamed of being too biased, as is the culture of most white people).

While this all might seem absurd and crazy to the average white person, it actually is pretty normal for other groups to consistently and deliberately pressure for preferential treatment towards their group in a non-meritocratic fashion. For example, in the UK, there are reports of Muslims receiving overwhelming preferential treatment when in prison: 1) they receive more food (and crazily enough pressure non-Muslim inmates to convert to Islam in order to receive more food); 2) some have higher quality prison cells that often approach the quality of apartments with couches, kitchens, and TVs (especially regarding the Muslim leaders), while regular Brits get no furniture or anything in their cells; 3) they are able to get away with a lot of stuff without being punishment. This is all because Muslim people have a strong “brotherhood” – and thus if a Muslim inmate leader orders a prison guard to be killed, prison inmates will do so. Thus, everyone in prison is afraid to question the authority of Muslim leaders, and the prison guards find it easier to just give the Muslim inmates what they want. So again, I think a similar thing occurs in elite schools – Jewish groups (who are highly organized) constantly pressure the institution to do more to help Jewish students and savagely ruin the careers of anyone who refuses, and the schools just go along with this because it is the easiest thing to do.

To emphasize the obvious: Muslim prisoners receiving preferential treatment by the prison staff doesn’t mean that they are better behaving than normal British prisoners. It just means that they are better organized and more willing to exert pressure to help their specific group in a way that normal white people (who pride themselves in treating everyone equally) would never do. If Muslims would do this, then of course Jews would, since Judaism has far more elitism than Islam.

Examples

This is all possible because elite institutions explicitly use group membership in their decision-making process of enrollment. As discussed in depth by the aforementioned The Myth of American Meritocracy, IB league universities have a long history of dramatically changing the demographics of their student body population as pressures for and against affirmative action changed.

Another example of this is how in the past, it appears that there actually used to be discrimination against Jewish students – thus the Jewish student population would significantly change as schools switched between meritocracy and antisemitism. Obviously, this isn’t the case anymore, but I suspect the mechanisms behind all of this could still be operating, just in reverse, so as to help Jewish students. Here are some examples of pressure being placed on these enrollment mechanisms to increase Jewish enrollment:

Angry at MIT’s Jewish president, a Jewish alumni group has a plot to oust her – According to the MIT alums, Sally is undermining Jewish students. Can you imagine white students ever using such racially explicit language as to say that a person is “undermining white students”? LOL
As extensively outlined in the article, many of the times universities have increased the “white population” – thus ostensibly reversing affirmative action – all they really did was increase the Jewish students, and the white student population remained unchanged or even decreased (thus ironically resulting in the academic performance of students dropping).
This reminds me of how recently Harvard appointed another Jewish person to be president (Alan M. Garber) in an apparent move towards rolling back affirmative action. Will this guy actually make the school meritocratic, or will he repeat the actions of his predecessors and just move seats held by nonwhite students to equally lackluster Jewish students?
Another example from the article: “in 1999 Princeton discovered that its Jewish enrollment had declined to just 500 percent of parity, down from more than 700 percent in the mid-1980s, and far below the comparable figures for Harvard or Yale. This quickly resulted in four front-page stories in the Daily Princetonian, a major article in the New York Observer, and extensive national coverage in both the New York Times and the Chronicle of Higher Education. These articles included denunciations of Princeton’s long historical legacy of anti-Semitism and quickly led to official apologies, followed by an immediate 30 percent rebound in Jewish numbers. During these same years, non-Jewish white enrollment across the entire Ivy League had dropped by roughly 50 percent, reducing those numbers to far below parity, but this was met with media silence or even occasional congratulations on the further ‘multicultural’ progress of America’s elite education system.”

Jewish Leadership

Another factor helping to explain the in-group bias of elite schools is that many of them are led by Jews, and so obviously Jews have the power to control the enrolment system. Here are some quotes from the main article illustrating this:

“Indeed, Karabel points out that by 1993 Harvard, Yale, and Princeton all had presidents of Jewish ancestry, and the same is true for the current presidents of Yale, Penn, Cornell, and possibly Columbia, as well as Princeton’s president throughout during the 1990s and Yale’s new incoming president, while all three of Harvard’s most recent presidents have either had Jewish origins or a Jewish spouse.”
“At most universities, a provost is the second-ranking official, being responsible for day-to-day academic operations. Although Princeton’s current president is not Jewish, all seven of the most recent Princeton provosts stretching back to 1977 have had such ancestry”
“Three of Caltech’s last six presidents have been of Jewish origins, but the objective admissions system has produced no sign of ethnic favoritism, and largely meritocratic MIT also seems unaffected by having had two Jewish presidents of the last five.”

Implications

For the right wing coalition in America to truly win the culture war, 1) we need to end the Diversity Equity and Inclusion movements in corporations, 2) we need to end censorship from social media – which in part requires us to end the unceasing pressure from advertising groups to have censorship, and 3) we need to change leadership of our institutions to stop being so left wing, because you can’t change the culture without first changing the institutions.

But unfortunately, this is all sort of impossible because the leadership of America’s top corporations and institutions nearly exclusively come from IB league universities. And students from IB league schools tend to be very leftist because: 1) nonwhite people are very leftist, 2) Asians are very leftist, and 3) most of the spots allocated to white students in the affirmative action schemes are actually taken by academically mediocre Jewish students, who are perhaps even more leftist than even nonwhite people and Asians.

Case Study: Elena Kagan

The career trajectory of Elena Kagan is a good example of how Jewish people are able to promote each other to become in charge despite lacking merit. Essentially, Elena Kagan magically climbed the ranks from professor in the University of Chicago, to dean of Harvard law school, to supreme court justice, despite lacking merit at each step.

These two articles discuss this issue more: Hype for Elena Kagan—Round Two, Elena Kagan’s “diversity problem” and Jewish privilege, so I will only give a brief summary:

Elena has very few publications in law review journals, hardly enough to reach tenure let alone become a dean.
She seems to have gotten ahead in life because of either A) directly being appointed or hired by fellow Jews for positions that she didn’t really deserve on merit, or B) receiving constant ridiculously underserved praise from fellow Jews and pressure to appoint her to higher positions.
This quote from Hype for Elena Kagan—Round Two helps illustrate this: “Once again, the same people are hyping Kagan as absolutely brilliant. In a recent Huffington Post article (‘Elena Kagan Emerging As Supreme Court Front-Runner’), Charles Fried says, ‘She is a supremely intelligent person, really one of the most intelligent people I have encountered, and I have met a lot of them, as one does in this business. She is very adroit politically. … She has quite a strong personality and a winning personality. I think she’s an effective, powerful person and a very, very intelligent person, and a very hardworking and serious person.’ Presumably she can also walk on water.”
It appears that over half of the people she hired as dean were Jews – thus I guess she was passing on the privilege she gained from the Jewish community on to the next generation. Funnily enough, the only complaints she received about this was that she was actually “racist” against non-white people, though of course the number of non-Jewish white people she hired would have also been low.
She became the third member of the supreme court to be Jewish at a time when no-one on the court was protestant.

Hollywood and Media

OK, now that I have established Jews don’t occupy positions of power purely on the bases of their intelligence, let me now start going through the realms of influence they have in our society. In this section, I will prove that Hollywood and the Media are overwhelmingly controlled by Jewish individuals. And again, before you ban me, I ask you: is what I am saying factually true or not? How can something be evil if you aren’t even sure if it is false?

* this graphic shows how most executives in media companies are Jewish.

According to Grokipedia

I decided to start with this report with Grokipedia (Jewish Americans in the Media) because I thought it was most likely to be unbiased:

“Contemporary leadership reflects continued overrepresentation. A 2008 analysis of top studio executives identified eight key figures—Peter Chernin (News Corp), Brad Grey (Paramount), Robert Iger (Disney), Michael Lynton (Sony), Barry Meyer (Warner Bros.), Leslie Moonves (CBS), Harry Sloan (MGM), and Jeff Zucker (NBC)—all of whom were Jewish, comprising 100% of the sampled group at that time.[3] As of 2025, Jewish individuals hold CEO positions at major entities including Disney (Bob Iger) and Warner Bros. Discovery (David Zaslav), with the Redstone family (Jewish) controlling Paramount Global via National Amusements.[23] Estimates from 2022 place Jewish representation among Hollywood studio executives, managers, and talent agents at around 20%, or roughly 10 times the population share.”
* this article has a lot more to say regarding Jewish control of media if you are curious.

This Jewish Person’s Article is Funny

Los Angeles Times – Who runs Hollywood? C’mon

“How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full-page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by: News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish).

…The Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. When I called them to talk about their incredible advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, apparently out of fear of insulting Jews. The sixth, AMC President Charlie Collier, turned out to be Jewish.

As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. Without us, you’d be flipping between ‘The 700 Club’ and ‘Davey and Goliath’ on TV all day.”

The article goes on to discuss how many fellow Jews are afraid of letting the public know who controls Hollywood, and hope that public perception of Jews in Hollywood decreases. The author then sarcastically notes how “Foxman [a Jewish person who doesn’t want Americans to know that Hollywood is controlled by Jews] would prefer people say that many executives in the industry ‘happen to be Jewish,’ as in ‘all eight major film studios are run by men who happen to be Jewish.’

…I appreciate Foxman’s concerns. And maybe my life spent in a New Jersey-New York/Bay Area-L.A. pro-Semitic cocoon has left me naive. But I don’t care if Americans think we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.”

The Press

This quote from The Myth of American Meritocracy (of which I heavily quoted in my discussion of Jewish academics) is also noteworthy in showing that Jewish influence extended past Hollywood into all of our media and press:

“The collapse of the long-standing Jewish quotas in the Ivy League during the decade following World War II only occurred as a result of massive media and political pressure, pressure surely facilitated by very heavy Jewish ownership of America’s major media organs, including all three television networks, eight of nine major Hollywood studios, and many of the leading newspapers, including both the New York Times and the Washington Post.”

This article from the Occidental Observer further elucidates the role of Jews in the media, of which here is a quote:

“In their book Jewtopia: The Chosen Book for the Chosen People, Bryan Fogel and Sam Wolfson confirm Jewish dominance in Hollywood, noting that of the ten major studios under discussion, nine were created by Jews (Walt Disney was a Gentile), and as of 2006 all ten studios were run by Jews.

…Incidentally, Fogel and Wolfson also did the same for American TV networks, finding a leadership figure of seventy-five percent. Discussing print media, they found that seven of ten major publications are run by Jews.”

* so it appears that at the time that book was published (2006), Jews controlled 70-75% of the press.

Outcomes

Of course I would have no problem with Jews controlling the media if their influence was benign. But it isn’t – Hollywood is extremely antichristian and anticonservative – and here are some examples of that:

A report in 2018 found that among a sample of top Hollywood executives (“THR 100”), around 99.7% of their political contributions went to Democrats or Democratic-leaning organizations (The Hollywood Reporter).
The film Sound of Freedom (2023) is described by some as a Christian-thriller or faith-adjacent film, though it was primarily about the efforts to combat child sex trafficking done by Tim Ballard, my hero and a Mormon whom my parents knew personally. It was reportedly “rejected by Hollywood for years” before eventually being picked up by a faith-based, Mormon distributor (Angel Studios). Its success has been framed by many supporters as evidence of Hollywood gatekeeping or a bias against content appealing to Christian/conservative audiences (christianlearning). But if I add my 2 cents, as described in Does Every Antisemitic Stereotype Come from The Talmud?, Jewish doctrine found in the Talmud explicitly permits pedophilia, and the practice of pedophilia is very common among Jews, especially orthodox Jews (this discussed in Judaism Idle Talk). Thus, especially seeing the many creepy reports of pedophilia and abuse occurring in Hollywood, it’s not difficult to imagine that perhaps Hollywood execs weren’t super excited about a film like this being released (and were perhaps afraid the film would explicitly target Hollywood as a perpetrator of abuse).
As per this article, “When country singer Dolly Parton told Vogue magazine a couple of months ago that her idea for a TV series about a country singer who becomes a gospel singer was turned down by Hollywood, she said that ‘everyone’s afraid to touch anything that religious because most of the people out here are Jewish, and it’s a frightening thing for them to promote Christianity.’”
The Youtuber Taylor Alesia has made a lot of good videos covering problems with Hollywood.

For some reason, it appears more acceptable in our culture to accuse Hollywood of being left wing and having a culture of abuse because it is secretly full of satanists, than to accuse it of these things because it is full of Jews. But surely the more simplistic and empirically validated reason behind the weird creepy things of Hollywood is not satanism or witchcraft (which might still sometimes be prevalent), but rather frankly the religious background of Hollywood execs.

Banking

My understanding is that Jewish power in banking used to be very much greater than it is now, and that it is in the decline. Nevertheless, they still seem to have a hugely disproportionate stronghold in the industry worth noting:

This article does a good job at quantifying the Jewish control over the industry, so here are a few graphs from it (just to note, I haven’t personally verified everything in these graphs so forgive me if it is wrong):

Lehman Brothers Blame Game

As is common knowledge, the Lehman brothers is widely blamed for the 2008 crash, and (of course) the Lehman brothers was controlled by Jews.

This quote is pretty funny:
‘If it was Lehman Sisters, it would be a different world’ – Christine Lagarde – IMF head says the male domination of banking could lead to another financial crisis (theguardian)

If we are going to start playing the blame game of which group is truly to blame for the Lehman brother’s decisionss – of which the democrats opened Pandora’s box when they decided to blame all men for conduct of that company – then we may as well be honest about it:

Firstly, if you know anything about Jewish religious texts (as I explain my essay on the Talmud), then you should know that Judaism very explicitly permits its members to lie and trick gentiles to gain money, and even encourages this including text teaching members good ways of stealing money from gentiles. Similarly, it also very explicitly prohibits members from informing police of crimes committed by other Jews.

So, is it a coincidence that the one bank that lied so much that it got itself into a position where it had to be bailed out by the government, and in the process caused an economic crash, was controlled by a group of people who belong to a religion that explicitly teaches its members that they need not repay loans if their creditors are gentiles, or teaches that they don’t need to pay wages to gentiles even if they promised to do so (as I discuss in my essay on the Talmud)? Even if this isn’t the case, does it seem like a good idea to anyone to for our banks to be controlled by people from a religion with doctrines encouraging members to lie, steal, and trick through business deals, when we have hundreds of millions of citizens not part of that religion?

In summary, I can’t quantify how likely it is Lehman brothers would have deceived investors if it wasn’t controlled by Jews, but I know that the likelihood of this being the case is at least a thousand times higher than the idea that all Lehman brothers needed was more women in order to not go about deceiving people (according to one poll, women are twice as likely to lie as men).

But what is even more funny is the IMF head, Christine Lagarde, who said ‘If it was Lehman Sisters, it would be a different world’ is likely Jewish, given her mother is Jewish (Wikipedia). Thus, it’s hard to say whether she even believes what she said, or if she only said it because she wanted to draw attention away from the Jewish control of that bank.

More on Banking

This article goes through the history of how most banking dynasties are Jewish, including the Lehman brothers.
Another random history article on Jewish banks in America.

Federal Reserve

This article also discusses the influence of Jews in the federal reserve; here is one noteworthy quote from it:

“Janet Yellen, following her tenure as Fed chairperson, is the first woman and is the third Jew in a row to be the US Treasury Secretary (not counting temporary “acting” stand-ins), succeeding Steven Mnuchin and Jack Lew.
(Other Jewish Secretaries of the Treasury include Stuart A. Levey, Lawrence Summers, and Robert Rubin.)”

* Of course, the current secretary of treasury is not a Jew, in line with how most Trump appointees are not Jewish.

Regarding Blackrock:

If you know much about politics, you will know that Blackrock is responsible for a great amount of evil in the world, because it uses investment pressure to force companies to do leftist things like DEI and censorship. Which is a big problem because blackrock has 13.5 trillion in assets under management – a larger amount than the GDP of many countries – for example, the GDP of the UK is only 3.9 trillion USD. And what’s dumb about blackrock is that they didn’t even become a big corporation in an honest fashion – they succeeded because federal government bureaucrats decided to give them a massive amount of money as part of quantitative easing during the 2008 recession and onwards. In summary: I can’t say for sure whether Blackrock would have still done the evil leftist things it has done under the leadership of non-Jews, but I do know that Jews are among the most leftist of groups out there (discussed in Judaism Idle Talk), and it would actually be really unlikely for Blackrock to not be super left wing if it was under Jewish control.

Chat GPT

* Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, is Jewish.

I saw an interview between him and Tucker Carlson here, and in it Tucker Carlson repeatedly asked Sam Altman what the moral guidelines of ChatGPT were, and Altman wasn’t really able to give a straight response. ChatGPT’s moral guideline is apparently made by hundreds of moral philosophers. However, Sam Altman refuses to tell us who they are because he alone bears responsibility for their decisions, but he also isn’t really able to actually tell us what they have done; needless to say, Altman also refuses to make the morality code in ChatGPT be opensource and is unable to tell us why.

Could that play a role in why ChatGPT seems to be hardcoded to protect Israel?

Source

Note: I wasn’t able to replicate this. However, I know this conversation definitely happened because someone archived one here – and since this archive is on ChatGPT’s website we can know for sure that this happened (and another replication is also here).

The Reality of Organized Jewry

One of the best instances of gaslighting on this topic is with regard to the issue of the existence of “Organized Jewry” which go about influencing politics. We are told that it is super antisemitic to ever assert the existence of any such thing. Yet, world organized Jewry very clearly exists, is very powerful and influential, and clearly seeks to influence politics.

Now, I guess it isn’t surprising that there is some degree of organization among Jews. But what unsettles me is that these world Jewish organizations don’t seem to actually care about the Jewish religion at all. The only two things they care about are: 1) helping Israel defeat the Palestinians, and 2) promoting laws against antisemitism or cancel culture against antisemitism. And it just seems clear that if any other world religion besides Judaism focused almost all of there efforts on either literally killing their enemies or on banning and canceling their enemies (fighting antisemitism), then they would very rapidly lose all influence across spheres.

So here is a summary of the major Jewish organizations I identified substantiating these claims:

worldjewishcongress – worldjewishcongress.org

My knowledge is that this organization tries its best to democratically represent all Jews across the world via elections and the like.
Rather than discussing teachings of Judaism, the website seems to primarily devoted to consolidating Jewish power over the world.
Most of their stories are about preventing antisemitism – which means of course increasing the number of jurisdictions across the world where antisemitism is illegal.
The rest of the stories are along the lines of pro Israel / anti Palestine propaganda.
Maybe this is normal to Jews, but for any other religion to do this would be pretty weird.

American Jewish Committee (ajc.org)

Again, doesn’t seem to care about actual religious doctrine.
Only focuses on criminalizing antisemitism, or pro Israel / anti Palestine propaganda.
Imagine if every single Mormon website was exclusively devoted to making anti-mormon content illegal and increasing land owned by the Mormon church. Ridiculous.

Jewish Council for Public Affairs (https://jewishpublicaffairs.org/)

Again, only seems to focus on politics and making it illegal to criticize Jews.
Doesn’t actually discuss religious doctrine.
Where are the advocacy groups for Christians / white people that do any of this sort of thing?

Jewish Federations of North America (https://www.jewishfederations.org/)

A main focus of the website seems to be charity exclusively to help other Jewish people.
Again, the website focuses on combatting antisemitism and pro israel propaganda.
Doesn’t discuss religious doctrines.

Hypocrisy

If you sit down and think about what these organizations do, it seems very hypocritical: Part of what they do is spend significant amounts of resources trying to persecute people who assert that “organized Jewry exists and is trying to influence politics”. Yet they only are able to do this because they themselves are quite literally organized Jewry trying to influence politics.

This reminds me of the IHRA definition of antisemitism (discussed in Judaism Idle Talk), which has led several countries and several US states to end free speech by banning speech which per this definition is antisemitic. According to the definition:

“Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.”

So just to step back a step: Jews are using governments to force people to not be allowed to say that Jews control governments. Do you see the contradiction?

AIPAC Related Stuff

Perhaps the most important way Jews have influenced the world is their influence on politics. So here are some statistics:

50% of political donations going to Democrats are from Jews, compared to 25% of those going to Republicans (jpost).
13/25 of the top political donors in the USA are Jewish (Do Black/Latino Votes Matter? JEWISH Donations to Political Candidates, 2022).
According to AIPAC: in its 2022 cycle, its PAC endorsed 365 candidates — and claimed that “98%” of those endorsed won their general-election races (source).
AIPAC is the biggest source of GOP donations in Dem primaries (politico)

Here is a graphic that shows the degree of control AIPAC has over our government:

(source of the graphic)

It seems pretty obvious that all of this money is the reason why the single thing that receives bipartisan support is support for Israel. Otherwise, it is pretty confusing that Democrat politicians continue to support Israel despite the overwhelming majority of their constituents being opposed to Israel (Democrats in Congress Are Out of Touch With Constituents on Israeli Genocide; Democratic leaders still support arming Israel. Their voters largely do not, citing Gaza ‘genocide’; Aipac over affordability: Democratic candidates come under fire for support of Israel).

I bet all of this money is also why Judaism is the singular religion in America (at least for some states), where it is illegal to criticize them.

And if you doubt me on this, then I ask you: what is the point of all the money in AIPAC, if not to lobby to 1) make America give free money to Israel, and 2) mobilize government power to “fight antisemitism”

Support for Israel

America’s “special relationship” with Israel is another noticeable effects of the organized Jewish lobby. So here are some facts:

By 2024, Israel has received 330 billion in foreign aid from America, which is by far the most we have given to any country (source).
All past U.S. loans to Israel have eventually been forgiven by Congress. Moreover, unlike other countries, which receive aid in quarterly installments, aid to Israel since 1982 has been given in a lump sum at the beginning of the fiscal year, thus allowing Israel to lend our money back to us and collect interest [Only the jews would have you pay interest on your own gifts to them LOL]. “In addition, there is the more than $1.5 billion in private U.S. funds that go to Israel annually in the form of $1 billion in private tax-deductible donations and $500 million in Israeli bonds. The ability of Americans to make what amounts to tax-deductible contributions to a foreign government, made possible through a number of Jewish charities, does not exist with any other country. Nor do these figures include short- and long-term commercial loans from U.S. banks, which have been as high as $1 billion annually in recent years.” (source).
The Cranston Amendment (first passed in 1984, and renewed regularly) states that U.S. economic aid to Israel shall not be less than the interest and payment on principal on debts due the U.S. government in any given fiscal year (source).
“Unlike any other recipient of U.S. aid, Israel is not required to account for its expenditures. Israel, thus, is free to spend U.S. aid as it sees fit, including in ways that contradict U.S. policies – as in the building of settlements in the Occupied Territories.” (Institute for Middle East Understanding)
The US has a law requiring Israel to always have military dominance in the middle east, which requires us to not sell weapons to other middle eastern countries that are *too dangerous*, or if it does to offset such sails by also providing weapons to Israel; this law also requires the US to give first access in purchasing our most sophisticated weapons to Israel before other countries in the region (source).

Does any of this seem normal or natural to you? This graphic also shows how our support for Israel has been pretty continuous, even during times when Israel was at peace with its neighbors:

Tik Tok

Another blatant example of organized Jewish interests hijacking the US government is how the US transferred control of TikTok to the Zionists after research had found TikTok to be spreading antisemitic content. Now let me substantiate this claim:

The official story of course is that ownership of TikTok was changed because we were worried that TikTok would be used by the Chinese government against Americans. However, this is simply false, and everyone in government knows it is false, because before the movement to transfer ownership in 2025, the US government had already solved the issue of China having too much power controlling TikTok:

In mid‑2022, under pressure from U.S. senators and regulators, TikTok publicly announced Project Texas: a plan to “bolster security for U.S.-based users,” relocate U.S. user data to U.S.-based servers, and build stronger controls (TechCrunch).
As part of that plan, TikTok established a subsidiary called TikTok U.S. Data Security Inc. (USDS), staffed with U.S.-based employees. USDS was tasked with controlling access to “protected” U.S. user data, content recommendation, and moderation systems — all housed in a “secure cloud” managed by a U.S. partner, Oracle (TikTok Newsroom).
TikTok committed to deleting legacy storage of U.S. user data on older company servers and migrating all data to Oracle’s secure infrastructure (TechCrunch).
The company claimed that once migration and deletion were complete, U.S. user data would be inaccessible to China-based ByteDance employees (TechCrunch).

Oversight, Auditing, and Transparency Measures

As recently as June 2024, TikTok announced that USDS had appointed external, independent security inspectors (e.g. firms like HaystackID and OnDefend) to audit its U.S. data security infrastructure (TikTok Newsroom).
TikTok claimed that “protected U.S. user data” was stored in the Oracle Cloud by default, with controlled and monitored gateways such that only vetted USDS personnel could access it (TikTok Newsroom).
Further, TikTok opened “Transparency Centers” (“Dedicated Transparency Centers”) where third-party auditors and partners like Oracle could inspect its full source code, backend services, recommendation algorithms, and content moderation mechanisms (TikTok Newsroom).
According to a legal analysis of Project Texas: the plan envisaged multiple layers of independent oversight, including code inspectors, data‑deletion auditors, cybersecurity audits, annual compliance assessments, and third‑party monitors — many under the supervision of U.S. national‑security authorities (specifically the review body Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, CFIUS) (lawfaremedia).

Here are some examples of research conducted highlighting antisemitic content on twitter.

Research showing that TikTok has become a hotbed for antisemitic content, and is failing to down said content, but instead allows its algorithm to amplify this content (Institute for Strategic Dialogue).
More research showing that TikTok has become antisemitic and is failing to ban antisemitic content (University of Haifa).
Even more research showing antisemitic content on TikTok and complaining that it hasn’t been banned (Center for Countering Digital Hate).

Actions Taken by Congress to prevent Antisemitism in TikTok:

On Nov 21, 2023, a group of Republicans from the Committee (including Chair Cathy McMorris Rodgers) sent a public letter to TikTok demanding answers about “terrorist and antisemitic content” on the platform (E&C Republicans Demand Answers from TikTok over Terrorist and Antisemitic Content).
In October 2021, the Senate Committee held a hearing titled “Social Media Platforms and the Amplification of Domestic Extremism and Other Harmful Content.” In testimony submitted to the hearing, organizations cited examples of antisemitic content and extremist recruitment happening on TikTok, including content from known antisemitic figures (Congress, Congressional Testimony).
On March 5, 2025, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing titled “Never To Be Silent: Stemming the Tide of Antisemitism in America.” Part of this committee discussed how TikTok has been used to disseminate antisemitic content (Senate Committee 1, Senate Committee 2).

The final effect: TikTok Being Sold to Lary Ellison

In 2024, in a bipartisan effort the U.S. Congress passed a law requiring TikTok’s Chinese parent company (ByteDance) to divest TikTok’s U.S. operations or else face a nationwide ban (wikipedia).
In 2025, TikTok was sold to a group of investors led by Lary Ellison, with Oracle (owned by Larry Ellison) to manage the infrastructure and code of TikTok (reuters).

Who is Ellison?

Larry Ellison is the second richest person in the world (net worth 350-400B), and is ethnically Jewish but is reportedly atheist. He is also the biggest supporter to the Israel Defense Force and has repeatedly expressed his goal of helping the Jewish people. He and his son are also among biggest owners of media, controlling Skydance Productions, Paramount, CBS, MTV, BET, Showtime, Nickelodeon, Comedy Central, The CW, and more than 30 other subsidiaries. Upon purchasing CBS, Ellison then appointed Bari Weiss – a Jewish woman who has famously been a pro-Israel Activist her whole life – to be the editor in chief and had her report directly to him, thus bypassing the normal hierarchy.

Efforts from Ellison to Ban Antisemitism on TikTok

TikTok bans juice box emoji since it means Jews LOL (yahoo news).
TikTok’s new hate speech manager is former IDF soldier and proud Zionist (Jerusalem Post).
On Holocaust Remembrance Day 2025, TikTok launched an in‑app hub with short educational videos about the Holocaust in partnership with the World Jewish Congress (TikTok newsroom).
Recently, TikTok announced “we do not return results for hateful searches, and we work hard to proactively remove content promoting antisemitism before a user reports it … and have recognized the hateful use of “Zionist” as a proxy … TikTok is also currently the only major platform to specifically name antisemitism as a prohibited hateful ideology in our Community Guidelines, which we did in an effort to cement our commitment to protecting the Jewish community.”

In summary, the idea that we needed to transfer ownership of TikTok in 2025 to America because of the threat of the CCP doing nefarious things on TikTok is just extremely false. We had fixed this issue already.

Rather, what happened is: a few months after many organized Jewish groups started producing statistics about antisemitism on TikTok and advocating against the platform, both parties magically decided to agree with each other on the need to transfer TikTok’s ownership.

All I can say is: it seems very tragic that the person who gained ownership of TikTok clearly doesn’t have American values – the very first thing he does once taking the platform is crack down on free speech – being so shameless about his bias towards Jews as to appoint an Israel Defense Soldier to be the hate speech manager (among other things) to solidify Jewish control over the platform.

As a Mormon this also annoys me because there clearly seems to be a lot more Anti-Mormon content online than Anti-Semitic content – even including some people threatening to kill Mormons – and so the only reason I can think of for why everyone feels the need to ban and suppress antisemitic content but not anti-Mormon content is because of the Jewish lobby. This is even more accentuated by the fact that Mormons have been vastly and overwhelmingly more persecuted in America than Jews (research the early history of our religion). If Mormons had a lobby against this the way Jews did, we probably would be able to also end free speech to protect our religion – and it probably would be easy to guilt trip the whole population into feeling bad about attacking Mormons because of our religion’s early persecution (the same way Jews have guilt tripped us because of historical wrongs). However, the difference between Mormons and Jews is that Mormons actually believe in free speech, so would never do something like this.

Most White people in Biden cabinet were Jewish

Another blatant example of bias in government because of organized Jewish lobbying is how half of Biden’s cabinet is Jewish (according to the Jerusalem Post), despite Jews being only 2.4% of the population. These Jewish Cabinet members include: Antony Blinken – Secretary of State, David Cohen – Deputy CIA Director, Janet Yellen – Secretary of the Treasury, Merrick Garland – Attorney-General, Avril Haines – Director of National Intelligence, Ron Klain – Chief of Staff, Alejandro Mayorkas – Secretary of Homeland Security, and others.

Middle East Wars

Another example of Jewish Manipulation of US Politics is seen in our wars in the middle east. Most of these wars were under the pretext of defending American interests, promoting democracy, or countering terrorism. However, a careful examination reveals that in almost every case, Israel reaped significant strategic advantages, while the U.S. often paid the costs in lives, resources, and long-term regional instability.

According to the Costs of War Project at Brown University, all post-9/11 U.S. wars and military operations — including in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Yemen, Libya, and other theatres — have cost about US $8 trillion and resulted in 900,000 deaths.

The thing that makes me know with certainty that these wars were actually motivated by Jewish interest groups is the things that we didn’t go to war over:

We didn’t go to war to remove cartels from Mexico, even though Mexican cartels represent thousands of times more of a threat to America than random terrorists in Syria (per some estimates, there are hundreds of thousands of people in America who have been human trafficked, and in 2021, there were over a hundred thousand drug overdose deaths in America).
We haven’t done anything to help Armenia and Georgia against Muslims attacking them. Firstly, as Christian countries, surely these should be seen as allies in the same way as Israel might be. Yet, they clearly need much more aid than Israel – while Israel’s borders have been expanding, these countries borders have been slowly shrinking as Turkey and Azerbaijan keep on snipping off pieces of Territory. While we give Israel billions of dollars on the off chance that if we didn’t there might be a genocide in Israel, there have *already been* genocides in Armenia – with their last conflict with Azerbaijan being in 2020 – and Americans haven’t done anything to help them.

So now allow me to briefly review our wars in the middle east to demonstrate my point:

1. Iraq War (2003–2011, 2014–2017)

Pretense for war:
The U.S. claimed Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and posed an imminent threat. The stated goals were to remove Saddam Hussein, promote democracy, and stabilize the region.